<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog #4 &#8211; Planning and Implementation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lessonslearnedinid.com/2008/12/blog-4-planning-and-implementation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lessonslearnedinid.com/2008/12/blog-4-planning-and-implementation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:11:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.lessonslearnedinid.com/2008/12/blog-4-planning-and-implementation/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lessonslearnedinid.com/?p=81#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hey Tony, great post. I have to comment on something you mention - &quot;In the real world, many of us are blocked from accessing these tools...&quot;  With the prevalence of Web 2.0 tools, where do we begin defining &quot;the real world&quot;? I feel that employers that are not accepting these new applications are marginalizing themselves from the majority of users - the majority of internet users should be considered the &quot;real world&quot;. I know we each have our own realities of what can and cannot be done through our employer&#039;s firewall - but the use and implementation of Web 2.0 technologies goes beyond the work place. 

I know it is just semantics, but the more we identify Web 2.0 as the real world, and the absence of technology as &quot;not the real world&quot;, the stronger our positions will be as we negotiate access with paranoid IT directors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tony, great post. I have to comment on something you mention &#8211; &#8220;In the real world, many of us are blocked from accessing these tools&#8230;&#8221;  With the prevalence of Web 2.0 tools, where do we begin defining &#8220;the real world&#8221;? I feel that employers that are not accepting these new applications are marginalizing themselves from the majority of users &#8211; the majority of internet users should be considered the &#8220;real world&#8221;. I know we each have our own realities of what can and cannot be done through our employer&#8217;s firewall &#8211; but the use and implementation of Web 2.0 technologies goes beyond the work place. </p>
<p>I know it is just semantics, but the more we identify Web 2.0 as the real world, and the absence of technology as &#8220;not the real world&#8221;, the stronger our positions will be as we negotiate access with paranoid IT directors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
